The pattern is the same everywhere: a capable internal team, more backlog than people, and one or two areas (MES, a migration, historian design, an ERP interface) nobody on staff has done at this scale. Hiring for that takes months. We put senior Ignition engineers inside your project instead.
Our engineers work in your repository, to your standards, in your process. Your team keeps ownership throughout.
Many internal teams now move fast with AI help, and that's good. What tends to fall behind is a consistent architecture across a growing system, and responsibility for behavior under load and failure. That's the gap our engineers close, working alongside your people. How we think about AI →
Some teams want an independent read of what they've built before adding people. Start with a free Ignition MRI. If the structure is the constraint, an Architecture Blueprint. If the project has already gone wrong, a Project Rescue.
A staffing firm sends whoever is available. We send senior Ignition engineers who have built these systems for a living, several from Inductive Automation itself, and they arrive already knowing where the platform breaks. We stay responsible for their work. Our name is on it.
Yours. We adopt your structure, naming, tag conventions, review process and release cadence. If those aren't settled yet, we can help define them.
Anything from a few weeks of surge through a migration to a long-running arrangement. We'd rather start small and grow on the strength of the work.
It stays with you. Our engineers work in your repository and your documentation, and we aim to leave your team more capable than we found it.
Twenty minutes with an engineer. Tell us what your team is building and where it's thin.
Talk to an engineer →